Originally Posted by crispus (Post 974910)

I can't say definitively, but I suspect the answer is that the duplicate of the removed picture simply hasn't been seen by a mod yet. What puzzles me, though, is why the first two iterations were unacceptable in the first place; in that vein I'd suggest that whenever possible (if the violation and/or violator aren't too egregious) a moderator removing part of a post leave some explanation, as the second excision in this thread did, namely "***** MAINSTREAM MOVIE CAPS REMOVED *****"

So as not to seem (or not exclusively!) pedantic, here are some pictures relating to the thread theme: for me, seeing 'neath the loincloth is what's key...


Edit: my slow connection meant the reply I started before Slick's response didn't post until after his did; not to be too argumentative, but I didn't recognize the picture in question as professional, and had often seen it without watermarks at non-pay sites; how are we to be sure, especially when some sites add watermarks to pictures they neither originate nor pay for, i.e. they repost exactly as many of us here do?

Originally Posted by Amurion (Post 1305797)

Does anyone know the story behind these photos, or what event they were taken at in the very least?

Originally Posted by hrnsk (Post 1431047)

If i remember correctly these were taken at the Berlin Loveparade. I think those are promoters of a porn production company