I saw this series on a Volafile thread and grabbed it. I gotta say -- I really like the casual nature of it and the fact that these girls are so normal looking.

There are a couple of incredibly lucky guys but you don't see much of them. More in the zip.

I'm not sure if it still exists, but there used to be a Flickr account with several of these photos; most of it the Pacific Northwest (some of your photos are from the Columbia River).

I also found them at vola, and posted https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/sho...postcount=2686

Sort of so, though a) I think the account you refer to is gone (checked 3 w/flickr backtrack technique and got "not found") and b) there's a little mashup (not so much apples and oranges as perhaps Golden Delicious and Honeycrisps?) in that there are also pictures in mplsmorgan2's post from an account that's still there, though not added to in some time, and which has been referenced many times here (and, lest anyone think that's something that merits removal of these most recent, let me plunk firmly for the positive value of reintroducing them to people who have been here a bit less long than my geezer cohort), possibly first in the Nude Vacation thread: it's the Naked Yogini women sampled (another example below) at flickr.com/people/nataliaa/

funfunfun

S'more girls having fun

*****FAKE ALERT*****

NO! NO! NO! This is the third time I've caught this one here. Delete this fake from your computers.

The posted fake is on the left and the real photo is on the right.

What photos were removed, and why? If they were my photos of girls having fun, why were they removed? They were having fun, just as the thread wants. This has happened before. Why?

This section is titled Exhibitionists and Voyeur.

Your photos of girls posing knowingly and willingly for a camera inside a studio setting is neither exhibitionist nor voyeur.

These photos are clearly exhibitionist, as the thread as the threat allows. They were not taken in a studio as the background and marginal light suggests. The girls knew where was a camera present, ergo the exhibitionism. That's part of the definition of the thread. Please advise.

Exhibitionism, as this section is intended to promote, is when a person or persons are nude in a public or semi-public situation or place where they others may see them. Posing in a bedroom with only a cameraman is NOT exhibitionism.

My advice is for you not to argue with me, and accept my decision.