| Rosencrantz |
10-23-2009 08:37 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by chesney78
(Post 613546)
Not convinced about those, why would it take so long for them to appear? Everyone knows she posed nude before being famous but that was all revealed over a decade ago but the pics never appeared. I suspect they may be fakes, might be worthwile posting in celeb section where there are a few experts about who may confirm one way or the other.
|
There's very little early Sam Fox online fullstop, purely because there's not many photos that predate digital online at all. Even with her more well known shots, the material that's digitised represents a fraction of what exists in magazine collections and photographer's catalogues.
The photos are real, I've seen them in magazines over the years. For the Australians in the crowd; People and Picture magazines from the early (pre-Photoshop) nineties were a common source. As were single issue fanzines from the UK that sometimes turned up in girlie section at the newsagents.
And for the curious, try typing samantha fox's name, followed by nude, pubes, bush, or some variation, into Google. The photos are easy to find, you can see for yourself. I would post a few examples, but the board has age rules and while Sam was pretty developed at 15/16/17, the fact remains that the shots would still be verboten. |
