![]() |
maybe the stars are too black
3 Attachment(s)
but i would be thankful if you tried
|
or this sweddish girl
3 Attachment(s)
the last one i had to make smaller to upload
|
2 Attachment(s)
anyone try this one....cheers!
|
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
You see how easy it can be!
|
unmasking
Found a webpage with tutorial and software that unmask pixeled photos
http://www.geocities.com/Tokyo/Dojo/4051/ramfaq01.htm |
4 Attachment(s)
Well?
|
3 Attachment(s)
on a similar note ...
|
The last three are fakes!
They where around two years ago, there a lot of thembut they where all fake. Look at the fisrt one, it a jean skirt, how can you look throught denim? |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
I think your software doesn't produce as good of results as mine does. If you are generating results like this from primarily auto-levels and contrast adjustment, you're going to have a hard time enhancing the luminance levels. When the results are pixelized to that degree, I recommend reducing the work area (like I did) so that you don't have to exagerate the differences between so many pixels. Iv'e included a more basic example of what my software does when using just basic functions, along with the results of your auto-levels and contrast. I went a slightly different route: Polygon Lasso tool (focused on a more limited area) -> Contrast +50 -> Hue -20 -> Manual levels, darkened mid-range 30% -> Brightened +25, did not underline anything, did not run any additional enhancement tools I normally do. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:47 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.