another sexy redhead (surely someone else has more pics of her:cool:) and some blondes

This blonde is MILF pornstar Christina Skye!!! She is holding up her videos in one of the StinkiePinkie images:D

https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/atta...5&d=1343160524

I think you have forgot one pic about this ;) http://thumbs3.oneclickchicks.com/2/.../8/4183366.jpg

So your contribution is great. Thx for this

Not at the moment, Fango, but I'm 100% sure we'll see a ton of pics from her. I found this youtube video (pretty SFW by NAP standards) where I believe that's her being interviewed, and they talk about her winning pretty much every award. So I'm guessing there are a ton of pics.

hxxps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEj7FAmQP2Q

Thanks and not to worry about download-fatigue. It looks like a ton of heavy lifting, but I'm actually using Bulk Image Downloader, which makes grabbing a whole flickr set a one-click operation (pun intended). From there it's just sorting. For the past few months flickr wasn't allowing me to do that, but it looks like the newest BID update is now flickr-friendly again. There's also the added bonus of automatically naming the files as the uploader originally named them, so in this instance it tags and gives credit to the flickr user, instead of using flickr's generic "_o" naming system.

I can continue to grab files (from this poster and others) a few hundred pics at a time no problem, as they get uploaded.

I looks like Stinkie Pinkie's added another 800 or so photos since last night, and I'll grab and sort through them at some point later on. In the meantime, here's a small taste to keep everyone interested. I can't believe I'm posting a NN set from NAP, but these girls are so I can't I can't stand it. I'm not sure if they're practicing for the pole-dancing contest, or what's going on, but that would explain why they're not naked at this point. It's a bit of a tease, for me as well as you, since there don't appear to be any nudes of this duo yet. But this pretty redhead (yes, another redhead!) has about the best ass you can imagine, and the brunette ain't bad either.

Can't wait to see more of these girls, wearing less.

i will be posting tonite or later on
 

took great pics on Saturday, Sunday the cloud cover fucked it up (I'll see what I can do in post op), and my wittle bitty flash couldn't keep up. We just got home today, and my wife helped Tarryn Wylde with her routine, and I gave her some tunes to use. The party at Pervilion was BUMPIN on Friday, if you haven't camped there for the weekend you should. Pics are comin.

Even on a cloudy day do you really need a flash? :confused:

A monopod & the natural light seem like they could deliver quality images?? I'm asking because I've held off on a flash for my camera set ups.

i agree 100% i got a about 400-500 pics of her and the other girl with purple hair i posted in my first post. When you got a good opportunity and a good spot you gotta get all the pics you can, her name was Paige from a club in Chicago

Ruby... one of my favorite MILFy, redheaded pornstars (before she was an actual MILF...) :D

https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/atta...7&d=1343100378

One day I'm going to get to NAP:(

Got ya ;)

Maybe he's using a point & shoot? You're right that a DSLR should deliver great pics as long as you slow down the shutter speed a bit.

nope
 

its the standard flash and not a hotshoe...I was close enough to the fence that a real flash would have worked. I have an EPL-1

My pics from the event

some to get started with
 

gone through a few i messed up, and can brighten them a bit. All was not lost.

Some more Saturday, including one that proves sometimes being a seat on a women's bike is not a bad deal.

More of my pics from the 2012 event!

More from the 2012 NAP event.

No wet T, but I have a few of you.

A few more.

And a few more.

The last of the Saturday pics I have marked for posting.

More from NAP 2012.

Was the blond Kathryn Hustler Girl from NAP 2011 at the 2012 event? She was supposed to be.

https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/atta...4&d=1311100332

Beautiful!

https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/atta...3&d=1343160524

It looks like pubic hair might slowly start making a comeback. I see at least a little pubic hair on two of these women.

https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/atta...6&d=1343180820
https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/atta...6&d=1343125007

Cute and thankfully natural. :)

https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/atta...4&d=1343172374

I want to give a shout out to hmmm!, MAX21, and D_Arvy1! Thanks for posting those pictures. I love seeing some of the candid pictures and the silly expressions that you all caught me making. :P

I promise when my friend sends me the ones they took I'll post them for you all.

More 2009 duo
 

Since you like these two, flanker7, and were nice enough to thank me for my first post, here are a few more, slightly off-topic though they may be. I may post more of them and others in the NAP 2009 thread, as well. You are right, it was a good year.

Thinkin' of ya
 

Man, I was thinking about the Pervilion and you guys on Friday night, wishing I was there. Maybe I'll make it out next year. That place gets in your blood. Wish it happened more than once a year, and that it wasn't such a long drive for me.

Your wet t-shirt performance
 

Had perfect seating and a good camcorder with me. I edited down the wet t contest video to your segments. Thought you might like to turn everyone on with a repeat of your performance in the contest. So was it a turn-on for you and your hubby/boyfriend knowing so many men were lusting for you?

My first trip to NAP was in 1975. Armed with my little crappy kodak instamatic I shot a roll of out of focus blurry (probably so nervous and amazed at what I was seeing) pictures with no idea where I could send them to be processed. Thank goodness technology has improved. Started going regularly since the early 90's. Always interesting and love the amateurs so much.

Thank you so much! My friend said that their video file was bad, so your's is probably going to be the only one that I have!

LOL, I got just a tad bit excited from the adrenaline rush and had some interesting moves to say the least. :P Probably not bad for my first wet t-shirt contest though. It wasn't necessarily a sexual turn on for me, it was just exciting for me. And my hubby doesn't care as long as he is the only guy sleeping with me. I'm probably lucky that he is cool about it. It didn't even bother him when I posed with some of the male entertainers.

more from Saturday
 

boom

mo fo ya
 

saturday and sunday

For BID, did you buy the $24.95 software? I saw theres a free trial, but how long does it last.

I bought it a few years ago, and then it's like ten bucks a year to keep it updated. I hate paying for software like this, but when you think about it, how many hours have I spent downloading huge galleries one photo at a time? It definitely doesn't work with all galleries, though, so it's not a magic bullet. But just using it for flickr can be a huge time-saver.

On the other hand, I don't really use it that often. I mean, how often do you really want an entire gallery? With, say, a Fremont gallery, I really only want a dozen or so photos of my favorite girls, and can leave the rest. It would be completely defeating the purpose to download the entire gallery to my hd, and then have to sort through them to save just the ones I want, because what's the point of a ton of unwanted photos clogging up my hd. It really wouldn't save any time or effort.

Also, another potential problem: I noticed that the number of photos downloaded doesn't always match the number in the flickr gallery. However, I THINK this might be because it grabs them by original filename (not the flickr "_o" names), and it won't download dupes. I've noticed a lot of flickr users who upload big galleries inadvertently upload big batches of duplicates, so that could be it. However, I'm still trying to figure it out. It's not like I want to use software to download 1,000 pics, then spend hours trying to cross-reference and figure out which pics are missing. THAT would be annoying.

I've tried different things and its very had to download entire flickr albums. I wish "download them all" worked on downloading entire flickr albums. I've tried "DownFlickr" on Chrome but it didnt work. Now I'm using "Easy Flickr Download" userscripts.org/scripts/show/116629 (for Greasemonkey) in conjugation with download them all. With this method, you open the pictures you want in a series of tabs. So if its a big album its annoying but I rarely download entire albums. I haven't had a problem with duplicates or not downloading the total number with that method

IRL I am a photographer. A flash could be useful at events like NAP, both cloudy and bright days. Cloudy days will have bright white skies, cloudless days will have bright white concrete. A strobe would allow the photographer to adequately expose the subject (in this case the dancers) and not blow out the background. I can't imagine the spectators would care much for a big reflector blocking the view - a strobe is a happy medium.

They could also help with cameras lacking spot meters, where exposure is based on the scene as a whole. A backlit model will be underexposed by an automatic camera using full frame metering.

My .02.

I figured there HAD to be a forum somewhere that people were talking and posting about the event. It was my first time there but I have been wanting to go for many years.

Most interesting observation: I've never been at a large event that had so many NICE people. Even security was all friendly.

I'll post some of what I saw when I can. Thanks to the others who posted to show some of what i missed!

-r

a mixed bag.
 

the problem i was having sunday is that if a girl had nothing but the gray sky behind her, the pic didn't turn out. She would kind of melt into it. Also, did anyone like #4 as much as i did..wow

That's exactly right. A cloudy sky background is a big diffuse light source to throw off the metering. You need more exposure on the model than most auto exposure cameras will provide. And had you been able to for example force a brighter exposure (slower shutter, wider aperture, higher ISO), that gray sky would end very bright, potentially blown out.

Even if you had a spot meter (so you could expose for the model rather than the scene as a whole), you'd have to live with either an overly bright background, an overly dark foreground, or you have to add light.

In that situation, you did the right thing using a flash IMO. Unfortunately built in strobes generally can't keep up as you noted.

Thanks for posting.

Flash Option
 

I've been to a dozen or so of the NAP's & shot it in film and VHS. A good "Fill-Flash" will just provide you with a whole lot of really good images, rather than some under-exposed grainy disappointments. Too many time there is rain or clouds on Sunday, or you get under all the trees and it can get dark in there & the camera's light meter just get's fooled. Nice flash - all the time gets you many more memories. I've enclosed a couple of my no-flash disappointments from Naked City's Miss Universe pagents from the early eighties when I was shooting with 100 ASA Kodacolor film and NO-flash attachment. See how you get un-necessary shade where you don't need it and the image gets disappointing? ( She won that contest & was at others over @ Ponderosa that year & the next.) What a beauty - under-exposed. )

I think this is Littletts
 

I think this is Boot Camp Bunny

Re: the "downloading Flickr albums" discusson, I use a free program called "Downloadr": janten.com/downloadr/

Fango