Love it :)

I'm with Retrac55 here...Seriously, some ladies fully dressed in jeans shopping and pumping gas? That's supposed to be voyeurism?!? Come on, you can throw any modifier you want in front of the word, but that my friends, is not voyeurism. It's called looking...at anything you can see anywhere in public...at anytime. Please, the effort is somewhat appreciated, but there has to be another website for this kind of thing. "Basic Photography Techniques 101," or "My first Day With My New Camera." I guess I'll sign off now...I have to go be a voyeur - you know, go out into the real world and look at people carrying on in their daily lives, clothed.

Look guys, I didn't mean to cause any harm, just thought I'd post something different on the website. If its that much of a problem you don't have to be so rude about it. I was just trying to contribute a different taste of voyeurism. And yes, there are other sites out there that deal with this type of thing, but I enjoy this site and tried bringing it here as well.

But if its that much of a problem, I will quit posting them, and the mods should lock this thread.

Again, my appologies.

Although these pix are not to my taste, I appreciate any risks you've taken getting them. I wish I had the nerve to take some.:)

mhmm - I don't think retrac55 or swimcouple were attempting to be rude. I think they have valid points. I am actually a little on the line about this subject myself. I think that there is definitely something exciting about capturing a hot girl/woman without her knowledge whether she's dressed or not. And, likewise, there's a certain excitement about looking at pictures or video of the situation since part of the draw to stuff like this is getting off on doing something that you aren't usually supposed to be able to do or see something that you aren't usually supposed to see. Yet, I see the other guy's points in that non-nude pics and vids are really no different from every day life. I suppose it boils down to the difference between guys that have no fear in looking at hot women in those real life situations and guys that are a little shy about it so they enjoy seeing it after the fact. In that case, being as nice as possible, it's just a difference of opinion as to whether your content is good or bad. So, don't let a difference of opinion (at least that's what it seems to me here anyway) sway you either way from posting what you want to post. Forums like this have rules about what you can and can't do but I really don't think this falls into a case where you are against the rules. I do think it would be helpful if you included "NN" in the title of the thread so that members are at least aware of the fact that they won't see any nudity here.

All of that to say, keep on posting if you enjoy sharing. You do have guys that have enjoyed your stuff so I don't think it would go unappreciated if you continued posting.

Just my two cents.

Yep - i wasnt trying to be rude - just pointing out that this isnt voyeurism as normally defined. you can use your own definitions for anything but please be specific what youre posting here.

I also think this thread is a misnomer. 'Candid photography' should be called that, not 'first time voyeur' which implies something different to everyone who clicks on the thread. This looks like it's also what would be called 'people watching'. I don't think there would be an issue here at all if you simply changed the thread name.