Why would anyone photoshop panties over her shaved pussy for a fake.

The fake is the shaven haven unfortunately :mad:

Egostatic.com now says their fakes too.

http://www.egotastic.com/

Other sources are saying that the pussy pics are real, and that the others are fakes, possibly put out as damage control.

http://www.wwtdd.com

(several items down, though the video of the reporter getting attacked is worth watching for sheer entertainment value)

http://wwtdd.com/photo.phtml?post_ke...&photo_key=547

that is the link to what apptly confirms the validity of the more revealing pix, though i do not know what it means.

hmm,

Here's a thought. In all cases like this, the highest resolution image available is most likely the one that came directly from the original picture taken from the camera. Now look around and see which version has the biggest and clearest image file and decide for yourself.

...
 

its a fake

Balls
 

I want to think the naked one is real, so take my comments with a grain of salt.

Doesn't the panties shot look like she has balls? Look at other upskirts, they are much tighter.

good point. every time you resave a jpg, you lose some clarity. either way, it's definitely a good job. but i'm increasingly sure it's not fake.

and unless she's smuggling walnuts, those panties look a little large.

Here'a a link to the whole set. It would appear they're legit.

Link

Does she have a habit of not earing underwear?
We've noticed heaps of times that she hasn't worn a bra, but as anyone ever noticed the lack of panty lines showing through her clothing in any previous pics?

Anyway imo there seems a touch more light in the beaver shot.