Originally Posted by fitne (Post 3484346)

I suspect she intentionally opened her legs knowing that there were people taking pics.

Originally Posted by Yayaya (Post 3457064)

Yall ready for the most goated single post in this forums history. All the best in one place.

***** WATERMARKED PIC REMOVED *****

Originally Posted by jcm_03 (Post 3456737)

so yes i realise that by the very nature of a photo existing, there are photographers in ALL public shots...but I think there is something sexy about people at public events clearly attracting a lot of attention from multiple photographers and watchers

all of these are wnbr but don't have to be...but I find this situation differentiates it from the pure exhibitionist style public photos - as ~ usually ~ these are everyday people who just accept that having their photo taking is a part of participating

Originally Posted by Ludovician (Post 3456976)

Had to post the classic

Originally Posted by friez (Post 3484923)

There's gotta be a front shot right? All those photographers

Originally Posted by friez (Post 3484923)

There's gotta be a front shot right? All those photographers

Originally Posted by looksatnakedchicks (Post 3485014)

There's loads of pictures of her, but she asked for her pictures not to be shared on here. I think she regrets doing it.

Originally Posted by burger1701 (Post 3485044)

She did get a lot of attention. I can't understand why. An attractive early 20-something blonde getting naked in public. Who could possibly be interested in that sight.