![]() |
Nice idea for thread
Quote:
Look: as above. Many of these women are not conventionally glamourous (by the fashions of that era) but they are still beautiful (and they are more likely to believe their husbands found them beautiful). There is a greater "realism" and naturalness in many vintage pics eg natural bushes, no silicone, no botox, no tattoos no body piercing. BTW I appreciate shaved, naturally bushy and in-between!. Self-confidence (which can come from naturist body acceptance of "imperfections") makes a woman (or man) seem more attractive. |
Better then
Quote:
Look - natural women, not perfect models and variety - some tall/short, some small tits/some big, different tan/skin colors. The best really..they did their hair, some makeup and walked out proud to be naked and viewed. Age - variety again. Of course, looking at a young face, tight stomach and pert tits is my favovite. I do like to see older women who look to be in great shape. Bush - love it. Adds femininity and character. When all shaved then you lose some differences. Some have sparse pubes and some very hairy. I mean, look at red bush, amazing. Same goes for true blonde which is so unique. I personally love dark haired women who grow wild, massive muffs. Each bush adds some distinction. |
Where are the dates from?
Hi Nepter
Any "evolution" study requires dates to be accurate. In some of your images the dates are in the background and obvious. But with one or two exceptions (eg #3 below), my Yandex reverse image searches have not found any dates written on the images you have posted. So where do these other dates come from? Were they already on the images? Did you add them as a result of your research? (eg report in a nudist/naturist magazine of the pageant) or guesswork? eg https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/sho...12&postcount=1 #1 "France 1910" - reverse image search suggests 1950s not 1910. It looks like a burlesque studio shoot rather than a beauty pageant - I've never seen women dressed like this for a pageant. #3 "1945" looks like pin-up/porn rather than a beauty pageant to me - I've never heard of a topless/underwear pageant. xhamster.com/photos/gallery/pin-and-vin-1-pin-ups-vintage-pre-1963-8461080 has the 1945 date #4 "12.4.1952" an exact date! has a watermark saying "A smokin' fake". Reverse image search says fake Judy Carne or fake Judy Garland (without any date) alamzic.com/f-6/judy_carne_article_12017.html Background looks like bedroom furniture not a pageant. #5 "june 62" doesn't look like a pageant just a general naturist scene The following look like 1960s/70s hairstyles to me: #7 "1953" https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/sho...80&postcount=2 #1 "Nude Contest 1946" #6 "1947" https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/sho...70&postcount=8 #7 is not a pageant but from a set called "The Joy of Pantyhose" xfapix.com/49559-gina-gerson-kiki-b-silvie-luca-michelle-doris-ivy-russian-porn-gallery-3532685.html I'd love to know where you got the dates from as I am fascinated by this subject. Thanks |
10 Attachment(s)
Same contest
|
10 Attachment(s)
Another contest
|
Quote:
Why would someone post arbitrary dates on photos? |
Contests
I do have to envy the people who were contestants. Doing that must have been tremendous fun.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:59 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.