|
10 Attachment(s)
Pull your panties down to show us your belly tattoo.
|
1 Attachment(s)
only have one but would love to know if there are more of her
|
10 Attachment(s)
Sexy girls with tattoos
|
Ta-ttoo ta-ttoo
1 Attachment(s)
ouch!
hopefully not a repost, 35 tattoo threads... |
more ink than an octopus
1 Attachment(s)
And enough piercings to get airport metal detector staff worried
|
10 Attachment(s)
Back and ass
|
10 Attachment(s)
more...
|
10 Attachment(s)
More
|
8 Attachment(s)
more...
|
The NY Times Reviews a Book on Tattooed Women
2 Attachment(s)
Excerpt
While we await that book, we have Margot Mifflin’s perceptive and moving “Bodies of Subversion: A Secret History of Women and Tattoo,” first published in 1997 but reissued now in a heavily updated and resplendently illustrated third edition. For most of history, tattooing has been a male preoccupation, either a one-fingered salute or an exercise in swagger. Think of Popeye and his twin anchors. Ms. Mifflin had the good idea to examine tattooing in the Western world from a female perspective. Her relatively slim book doesn’t provide a truly wide-angle view, but the insights she brings are insinuating and complex. This new edition of “Bodies of Subversion” arrives at the crest of a wave. For the first time, according to a 2012 Harris Poll, American women are more likely to be tattooed than men. Some 23 percent of women have tattoos; 19 percent of men do. They’re no longer rebel emblems, Ms. Mifflin notes. They’re a mainstream fashion choice. The article has a slide show of eleven mostly SFW pictures of tattooed women going back to the 1920s http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/201...OKMIFFLIN.html |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:13 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.