more
 

butt naked in public

and...

very hot adds, anymore of Asian about to get insertion:D

WNBR Southampton a couple of years back. Lady on the right rode with her hubby that day. Seen her pre-ride pics too. A little Flickr search should help ;)

Patty
 

Is there any more of Patty

my favorite genre

Post 657, picture 6 of a chubby nude girl, with a sign behind her and to her right, what does that sign say?
I can read the smaller lettering, but what does the title say?
An organization of some kind, which might have a website.

No, sorry; not only was it a one-off, but doing a Google image search highlights my biggest frustration with tumblr: because everybody just keeps reblogging singles, the search results get clogged up in a repeating loop of those, rather than helping find, if not an original source, at least one that has others from the same set/session as the example. Ah, well...

In my own searches, I've been able to work out a couple tools to help weed out at least some of the false leads to trace pictures back to original sources, or at least those only a couple degrees of separation away from the original. You may already be using them, but if not...

1. When you do a reverse image search, choose the option to show all the photo sizes. Typically, the largest sizes came earlier, and since tumblr uses uniform sizing, that alone can weed out all the tumblr hits.

2. Narrowing down the time it was posted. Using the "custom range" option on the "time" search tool, you can eliminate a lot of the reblogging as well. If a pic is from the 2012 WNBR, then limit the search range to maybe just the summer of 2012. Or, if you don't know the range, just keep pushing it back earlier and earlier until you get a workable number of results. Oftentimes a photo will exist on the net for a couple years before it blows up on tumblr. Once you find that horizon, you've eliminated a ton of false leads.

By no means a magic bullet, but I just thought I'd throw in my two cents.

The white sign says Viewer's Venue

That reverse image search is pretty awesome! thanks!!

more
 

enjoy!

https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/atta...2&d=1390276457
https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/atta...3&d=1390276459
https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/atta...4&d=1390276460
https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/atta...5&d=1390276462

Wow, any more of this girl? Love these pics!

Thanks

Fango

google image search found these! :)

hxxp: // butttoucher. com/users/TeenyZoe

This girl is a redditor. Here are the remaining three pics in the series, which she titled "(F)lashing the neighbours again by playing in the yard".

She posts on r/gonewild as TeenyZoe, but she's submitted a lot more than what is currently linked to her reddit profile. Check out hxxp://fapproved.com/users/teenyzoe/images for more of her pics, including several more public sets in and around her yard. Love it.

Damn, I clearly live in the wrong kind of neighborhood! Only obnoxious screaming kids play in the yard where I live. :mad:

The OCC always pulls through. You guys rock!

After the Toronto Pride parade
 

Church Street couple

naked friday

variety-pack; also, if my orphaning 'em made you miss nudieman's "naked Friday," go back a page to check (and, if you're like me, thank) him...

***** FAKE PIC REMOVED *****

My Wife TNMilf
 

a few more for your pleasure!

***** HARDCORE PIC REMOVED *****

Nice
 

I love carmax

This is outrageous. They blocked the handicapped parking spot for this! :D

Well, having no clothes to wear in the winter is a handicap!

Spread em, cuff her and cavity search

a few recent finds

***** PRO PICS REMOVED *****

Fango, you've done it again. Of the three pics you removed that you said were pro pics one of the girls is on multiple other threads including this one (the red head), one I'm guessing you are interpreting as a pro pic because of the pose (the one with the scooter) and the third (in the laundry) I have absolutely no clue why you found reason to delete it. I've tried to follow your guidelines from the last time this happened but it obviously hasn't helped.

1. The redhead is Sarah Kay. She does appear in some amateur pictures, at public nudity events, but has also done pro photoshoots for pay sites. The picture that you posted was from the latter category (most likely from the site nudeinsf).

2. The second picture was removed because it looked like a pro pic: it was lit professionally, the image was very high quality, and the subject appeared to be a model, both appearance-wise and, yes, because she was posing like a model. If it looks like a pro pic, it most likely is a pro pic. These are the criteria I use when determining whether or not to remove a picture for being pro. I don't know what else to tell you. Either take it or leave it.

3. The third picture was from Abby Winters, a pay site.

I hope you've noticed that you have not been punished (i.e. banned) for posting pro pics. Accidentally posting pics that break the rules is not cause for banning. We tend not to ban unless the rules are broken intentionally or maliciously. That said, if it bothers you this much just to have your pictures removed, then maybe you're better off not posting here.

Fango

Fango, thanks for the response. I do go out of my way to avoid posting anything that appears to be a pro pic - I'm certainly not looking for trouble. It is somewhat confusing when some pics of a model are acceptable and others aren't (referring to Sara Kay). We have no issue on the second one - I wondered myself but decided to take a chance. As for the Abby Winters one, with no watermark, nothing discernible that would indicate it is anything other than two friends goofing around and not taking the time to research the origin, other than having previously seen it on the site I'm at a loss as to how to avoid similar mistakes in the future. I know you understand that.

I'm particularly curious about the rules around NudeinSF and other professional amateur sites (particularly one out of Europe whose name escapes me at the moment). I see pics from these and others on a regular basis including several within the last 10-15 pages of this thread. Beyond too many pics and too little moderator time, is there something I'm missing as to what is acceptable?

No pics from any pay site are acceptable here. Again, if you come across pictures that you know to be from pay sites, I strongly encourage you to report the posts so the pictures can be removed. As you said, there are only a handful of Moderators looking at thousands of pictures, so things do get missed. We need all the help we can get.

Thanks

Fango

butts
 

Beautiful girls!

more
 

enjoy.

walking naked down the driveway!!

Wonderful Carmax pic!

nip!!!!

hopefully all of these will pass muster:)

More pictures anyone?

I have the full set of this girl naked outside -- >https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/atta...2&d=1391790382


https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/show...&postcount=323 <-- posted here. :)

How about Elaina?