One Click Chicks Forum

One Click Chicks Forum (https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/index.php)
-   Exhibitionists & Public Voyeur (https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   London Zoo Streak For Tigers (https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/showthread.php?t=152927)

anonjohn 12-19-2014 04:30 PM

My guess
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Terrymc77 (Post 1915432)
Does anyone know any information about this picture?
It's very hot.
From the London zoo Streak for Tigers day.
The ladies have wedding rings on - is that there husbands?
I get the impression they are work colleagues, perhaps the people that arranged the streak.
Any ideas?
Would love to know more.
Thanks.

I have no information only guesses.

Based on my amateur interpretation of body language of a photo which can sometimes capture odd unrepresentative moments.

They seem to know each other well enough to be comfortable naked and close together. But I doubt they are work colleagues - I've never worked in such a friendly place! Perhaps they are from the same naturist club day out.

Assuming:
1. these are spouses (wedding rings on all 3 women and at least 1 man).

2. women are generally more modest and careful of avoiding sexual misunderstanding than men (assuming this event attracts naturists rather than swingers). Therefore I have given more weight to the women's body language than men.

Numbering the people from left to right 1(m), 2(f), 3(m), 4(f), 5(m), 6(f).

I guess:
2(f) holding 1(m) = couple
4(f) "spooning" 5(m) = couple and 4(f) keeping a slight distance from 3(m)

3(m) is being "familiar" with 2(f)
6(f) close to but not fully touching 5(m), 6(f) apparent breast position is due to her posing movement.
3(m) & 6(f) may be a couple (assuming 3 couples).

Supporting/refuting evidence would come an examination of other photos to see if any of these people were running together or showed other "tie-signs" like holding hands.

This reminds me of Eng Litt creative writing exercises at school - seeing a picture and having to make up a story. Maybe if there were pictures like this in Eng Litt, then literacy standards would improve!

twi53 12-19-2014 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anonjohn (Post 1915521)
I have no information only guesses.

Based on my amateur interpretation of body language of a photo which can sometimes capture odd unrepresentative moments.

They seem to know each other well enough to be comfortable naked and close together. But I doubt they are work colleagues - I've never worked in such a friendly place! Perhaps they are from the same naturist club day out.

Assuming:
1. these are spouses (wedding rings on all 3 women and at least 1 man).

2. women are generally more modest and careful of avoiding sexual misunderstanding than men (assuming this event attracts naturists rather than swingers). Therefore I have given more weight to the women's body language than men.

Numbering the people from left to right 1(m), 2(f), 3(m), 4(f), 5(m), 6(f).

I guess:
2(f) holding 1(m) = couple
4(f) "spooning" 5(m) = couple and 4(f) keeping a slight distance from 3(m)

3(m) is being "familiar" with 2(f)
6(f) close to but not fully touching 5(m), 6(f) apparent breast position is due to her posing movement.
3(m) & 6(f) may be a couple (assuming 3 couples).

Supporting/refuting evidence would come an examination of other photos to see if any of these people were running together or showed other "tie-signs" like holding hands.

This reminds me of Eng Litt creative writing exercises at school - seeing a picture and having to make up a story. Maybe if there were pictures like this in Eng Litt, then literacy standards would improve!

4 and 5 are definitely a couple. Not only spooning, but his right hand is in close proximity to her boob. My take is that 2 and 3 are a couple, and 1 and 6 are either the third couple, or singles with the group of 4. 1 is covering his nuts, and 2 has her hands placed politely on his hip. That says to me, they're not a couple.

Terrymc77 12-21-2014 10:41 AM

Thanks for the input
 
I'm not sure you're right. I haven't seen any more pics of these people running which leads me to think maybe they are ZSL work colleagues who helped arrange the day.

robot1 12-28-2014 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aardwhite (Post 1914975)
Do you know what, I get so much out of this site - I'm sure it's the least I should do. I'll try and get some up over the weekend.

Just wanted to see if there was an update on this? I dont know about anyone else but Id love to see any photos you have!!

Fango 01-27-2015 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aardwhite (Post 1914975)
Do you know what, I get so much out of this site - I'm sure it's the least I should do. I'll try and get some up over the weekend.

aardwhite, are you still planning on posting these pictures?

Thanks

Fango

aardwhite 01-27-2015 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fango (Post 1938425)
aardwhite, are you still planning on posting these pictures?

Thanks

Fango

I am. I mostly surf the site on my phone, but I promise to do so next time I get the opportunity when I'm on my laptop

daveduchovny 01-29-2015 09:32 PM

Sad news, it does not appear there will be any streaking in London Zoo this year.

I could be wrong but they have a schedule of events up to September including "Skydive for Lions" "Firewalk for Lions" and "London Zoo Stampede" (a 10K run going through the zoo), and they say they are focusing their fundraising this year on their Lions400 campaign.

There's no mention of any streaking for tigers.

karaban 01-29-2015 11:21 PM

I can't say I'm surprised. The turnout was much, much poorer last year than the year before, and these things are subject to the law of diminishing returns. End of a good thing though.

Swimashore 01-30-2015 04:37 AM

Reminds me one day I was walking down Oxford Street when a car full of Indians pulled up beside me and asked,
"Pliz, vere iz zee London jooo."
I sent them off to Golders Green synagogue before I finally twigged what he was trying to say.

grandeweasel 01-30-2015 05:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by karaban (Post 1939694)
I can't say I'm surprised. The turnout was much, much poorer last year than the year before, and these things are subject to the law of diminishing returns. End of a good thing though.

All the same, I'm surprised that pairing a naked run with a noble cause would have such a weak shelf life. There have been fully clothed runs for less pressing charities that have been going on for decades.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Forum RulesTerms of UseTerms of ServiceDMCA18 U.S.C. § 2257RTA VerifiedPrivacy Policy