Respectfully, I wasn't trying to "fake" it. I was attempting to use leveled interpolations for detection. (I was half way asleep, I might add when doing it. Hence why I ran out of time.)

"t's important to enhance What's Already Visible in an accurate and revealing way. "

Understood, If it's not detectable with the naked eye. Then don't do it at all. ie WAV

Btw- I really don't think the last picture can be detected by the visible eye. Due to the Dark color, resolution and lack of illumination. I was attempting to compensate for this by changing color curve's. For better luminosity.

Anyway, my experiment was a failure. And I might add, I posted the wrong pic anyway. :( (i meant to post the illuminated pic only. Not the colorized one.) Alex, or whom ever could you please "delete" the last two pics.

btw- How did you "detect" the last pic, I really don't think it can be done. If you can tell me how you would do it. I would be appreciative.

For Vidpro or whomever. Is there a way to improve the contrast to reveal more details in this picture?

used auto-levels, a little midtone contrast, and local area enhancement.

Great job man! Can you try this? :)

Too much colorization makes it look drawed on, best to leave it simple. To avoid my earlier mistake.

Any suggestions encouraged. (Note: my time is limited. One or two pix max every couple day and please use higher resolution pics. Over 800*600 preferred.)

can you do anything with this one?
 

sorry, posted it earlier, didn't know if anyone had given it a shot.

I proberly know where the nipple is at, I have a good guess at the areola stops. But as you can see below. The details only lead to guessing due to lack of resolution, Lack of transparency and lack of background illumination.

how about this picture? i think it's the same girl...

1) She has a bikini padding hiding the detail, and She's most likely shaved. She also has a clit ring?

thanks man
 

appreciate all the help...any luck with this one?