Till someone who downloaded the videos from Dailymotion will upload the vids to an allowed filehoster or to the sexy videos section. If it's depend on me, you have to wait till i have time for it (suppose a few days)
;)

ok .. wait a couple of days .. thanks:)

new ones over at Flickr. Klondike

Who's breaking the rules here.....?

Sorry, at Flickr they may be new, not over here at OCC in this thread:
The first pic was posted by Klimper with filename 'shopping2',
The third pic was posted by Graynsam with filename 'shopping', shot with camera DSC-N2 on 4-8-2009 at 19:12hr,
The fourth pic was posted by Voyeur01 with filename 'image1',
The fifth, last pic was posted once with the filename 'Probably agde', shot with iPhone 3GS on 11-8-2010 at 18:42hr.
Only the second pic i may have missed or may be really new but since all the other pics are already in this thread and this thread is becomming one of the leading threads over the whole web about CdA including voyeur pics, i suppose this pic is already in this thread.
I suppose people who may have missed to check some contributions, pages in this thread must go back in this thread because there are a lot of nice gems, pics in it, worth to have a look at.
;)

an walk to the beach...
 

enjoy!:)

These pics appeared yesterday in my contacts feed over at Flickr which means they were just uploaded. Usually that means they are not only new to Flickr but new to the web. In the vast majority of cases then, one can assume that they are also new to OCC.

Given that, it is not really worth the time for me to cruise back through large threads considering that chances are usually very slim that the pics are already up. And remember, I only said "new ones from Flickr". Flickr users are not suppose to upload web content, but occasionally, as apparently happened here, they do.

I appreciate your diligence, but I never said they were new to the thread. What would you have done in similar circumstances?

Klondike

I don't blame you, Klondike. You did and do a great job on this forum. Only the third pic by Graynsam was just posted a few pages back. I think in your situation and with not collecting all pics posted in this thread and with not the specific memory i have, i would have gone back 4-5 pages to check if they are not recent reposts and probably i did a google image search, especially by the last pic to see if there are more pics existing from the scene (as i was intruiged by the last pic).
I found out that with Google image search more and more OCC shows up in the results. I'm using Google image search now for some months while i before used the Tineye reverse image search, which mainly get less results than Google. Normally on Flickr the trusted members will mention if their uploaded pic(s) is/are webfinds. Unfortunately not everyone does that, so you are not always sure of that. I would probably mention by the submission: "Probably reposts, sorry if so and credits to original uploader".
In the future i hope that someone is keen to develop a function that you can see with a right click function or while uploading, if a pic is already in the thread or on OCC.
;)

when I wrote yesterday, I was unsure as to who the Flickr user was that uploaded those pics. Now I know it was jakeontime, who regularly uploads web finds.

Next time, I will check out my source a bit more carefully before posting.....

cheers,

Klondike

CDA
 

.....CDA......:)