I felt like working on it. :)

Here you go... I think it turned out very nice.

It looks good. You're getting good at getting through dresses. I would like to make one suggestion that might make them even better. When adjusting the levels, there are three sliders in Photoshop.

I think you're using the right-most one, and sliding it left, which works a lot of the time.

But, with pictures like these, try sliding the middle slider to the left. It will lighten up the darker areas but not make them as washed out.

Sometimes you can do a combination of the two sliders. Slide both of them a little bit left to achieve more luminance-friendly results.

Play around with it and see what you think. Keep up the good work!

Hey, those boobs aren't too bad! Awesome work, thanks :)

Good, Now try to edit it. So it looks more natural. ;)

more...

Dude.. You've done a lot of nice stuff on these pictures. But I disagree about this most recent one posted. I'm not sure how you came up with what you did, but I did a hard contrast without correction to show you what I believe is the correct reveal. I don't mean disrespect. I'm just not sure how you came up with what you did.


I've attached a comparison. On the left is a basic hard contrast I did. On the right is the image you provided. I've marked areas to demonstrate the contrast already available to the naked eye. This is not a put-down. I'm just not sure how you arrived at the image you did. Seriously, you've done a lot of great stuff so I guess that's why I'm confused about this picture.

Nice work as always.
I have just one comment: In ToEdit10.jpg it looks like the nipple is not at the same position as it was in the original photo.

Found these pics of a buddy's wife while using their pc. Love to see what those puppies look like.

I would love to see what her face looks like. If you post the images with the face, I know I can do something with them.


Since before I started this thread, I received a lot of requests to fix people's images. I'm happy to give them a try, but under the following conditions:

3. I would prefer to work on images with faces. If it's just a body part, it's not as interesting to me, and probably to most people. That doesn't mean I won't try, but images with faces and bodies are much more likely to get my attention.

Wow!
 

Very Nice! Can you tell us a little about the techniques that you used?

Please work your magic
 

Hi, can you work your magic with these vidpro, or anyone else for that matter!

Thanks!

I can make the girl in the black shirt work very well, but the picture is such low resolution. Do you have a higher resolution version I could try?

hows this
 

hows this - image rescaled...if this doesn't work, any other ideas on how to increase the resolution?

can you try the others as well?

To me, Its not a put down. I have been expermiting with various plug-in's. And various techniques using Photo-shop.

To be honest, I enhanced a False image presented by a photo shop plug in.

As you are Aware of. Photoshop Is limited Unless you Have CS2. I have been trying to overcome those limitations by using various plug-in's. Some have been successfull. Other as you see, Not so successful.

What type of Contrast did you use?

For mine, I used photo shop's elements auto-level and then Used a local contrast mask, and local contrast enhancement plug-in. And I still did not get the level that you have with your Contrast.

Do you use CS2?

Yes, I'm working with CS2. I use a custom made contrast sequence that subdivides the contrast between various levels of luminance, and then reassembles them into a more natural contrast range. Sometimes I have to repeat the process until enough levels are revealed. I've considered selling it, but the only practical application I can tell is to better see through clothes. So, I'll keep improving it until I think I can do something with it.

Now, if only we could get people to post high-res, non-solid covered babes with their faces showing... we'd be in business...

When You use layers and merging with Photo shop. You will see that the Aspect Ratio between the Background and layer one. Will Not always stay the same.

Presenting aspects sometimes different then the original pic. (Which Is why I try to limit merging under 50%.)

Contrasts as well can throw the Aspect off. As well as Auto-levels.

Also, Unless the Resolution is Clear, And the Cloth meterial Is easily see through. Then I am playing a guessing game with some of the Details.

Also Be aware, Vidpro Usually Enhances the Good pics only. While I have enhanced some not so Good Pics. (As a way of learning to improve my techniques.) Some of the Details, I am Guessing at. As I have stated before.

And I'm Going to mess up sometimes. Then I improve my mistakes and get better.

I thought So. I am stuck Using Photo elements 4.0. And The Mrs. Would never allow me to buy a 400.00$ Photo Program.

I'm Curious.
Would such a sequence work With Basic 4.0?

Also, Have you thought about possible Forensic use? For your application?

I'd like to state that I've taken on some brutal pictures. I established requirements for submissions so that I wasn't inundated with unfixable images, or images that weren't worth fixing. But I've taken on many challenging pictures, often times with good results. They're not always perfect, but I do what I can. Can I do better? Usually, yes. But I balance the results with the amount of time I want to actually spend on each of them.

I don't know if what I'm using would work with other versions. I suspect not, but I don't know for sure.

I've used these techniques to enhance security images for law enforcement and attorneys. Ususally security videos are poor quality. I'm able to enhance them quite a bit. So, there are a few practical applications I've been able to apply these techniques to.

These are just thumbnails. Do you have any larger images? These are too small to do anything with.

one enhanced...

another one...

I wasn't Trying to imply That you only Do "easy" pics.

Just that I am trying to make the Unfixable > Fixable. And Such, Guessing at a lot of details.

To be honest, Until Today. I couldn't For the life of me. Figure out, how you did some of them. (like The first pic, The pink Bra Gal) I figured, If I messed around enough lousy ones. Then perhaps I could improve to your level.

So please, Take it as a bit of flattery. And not a put down.

There are a few posted pics for Wndycty's request on this thread. Can they still be done. They are blurred but the face is there. Some have high resolution. He posted them but it would be fun to see the results.

Who can do a see-thru on this one?
 

Hi guys...who can do a see-thru on this one?She's a hot MILF...pls give it a go guys it will be much appreciated.Thanks.

All is cool. I just wanted to clarify that I have worked with challenging images, and even barely fixable ones. That's all.

The purpose of this thread it to enhance what's already there. I think we should refrain from guessing because it brings into question the validity of the images that were enhanced using real information. So, let's say if an image can't reveal actual information, we'll just skip it. There's plenty of other images that can be worked on. None of them were supposed to have this amount of detail viewable anyway... so we're already ahead of the game with the one's we've been able to improve upon.

XRay
 

Sometimes color information gets in the way of lumincance information. Here's a great example of how much more you can see when you reduce the saturation, and lighten the area. I did other steps too, but the bulk of the work took place once the purple was significantly reduced.

Ageed, If the picture is not Revealing. Then we will skip it.

One, Would have looked a lot better with a higher resolution.

Looks like a black bra under this white shirt. I've been trying to get it to come out more but my skills are no where near what some of you guys can do. Can any of you help with this one?

This is the only recent, none posted pic. That has some revealing of detail.

The rest are either too small, has Solid lines, or they are wearing a Bra.

The pregnant pic Has a Nip, But the resolution is so small. That it reveals nothing else.

The Brunette with the Black Dress. While it looks promising. All thats revealed underneath is a Bra and color discoleration.

This should be a easy one for people to do. (And is exp. Of the size that is needed for a good photoshop.)

subtle hint. ;)

Hi again......I too have attempted to "Alter" a few that have recently been posted. But, as others have said.. for the ones we cannot fix... you most likely wont see it reposted by us.

new try
 

more from me

hmm, Your photoshop Sunk my photoshop.

Nice Job on the last pic. Bravo! ;)

Have you ever....
 

Have u guys ever had a MILF u were crazy about?this is my one and it would b a dream come true if u could do a see-thru on this photo.pretty please guys...Maybe VIDPRO,MSNEVIL or DR SASHO could give it a go please.thanks.

I don't think this image is workable. If you have any others that you want us to look at, try sending those.

Hi VIDPRO these r all i got.please give it ur best shot even if i can only see slightly.thanks so much.

I can make the orange one work, but I can't see her face. Do you have a version with the face?

Have I got some winners...
 

Her name is Tere. She's usually pretty prudish, but we can change all that.

And the last one is Nikki Cox.

Enjoy...

*****PROFESSIONAL PHOTOS REMOVED*****