Our forum has over 12 million
photos, videos and .ZIP files.
uploaded by our members!
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Not my wife
I apologise but I see there is a misunderstanding.
The woman in the picture is not my wife, it is a picture from this forum trying to replicate the see-through effect. |
The Following User Says Thank You to itit49 For This Useful Post: | ||
#13
|
|||
|
|||
OMG YES!!!!!!
Quote:
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I have seen a few women go to work wearing blazers, sweaters, and other overgarments, and I wonder if they remove them to show off their bodies once they get to work and away from their husbands. The wife next door is plain and heavy, and when she goes out to her car to drive to work every morning she is always wearing a loose button sweater. Sometimes I will see her arrive home later and the sweater is off, and her big tits are bobbling in her tight shirt. The only good see-through episode I can recall offhand was a college intern working in my office one summer about fifteen years ago. Attractive, curvy girl of Italian descent, big tits. I once saw her walking down the hall in a plain white tee shirt, no bra. From way down the hall I could clearly see the silouettes of her dark areolas, as her tits bobbled. Also way back in the eighties, many women wore bras that were much thinnner fabric, and with the right woman with the right bra with the right blouse, I spotted a few areola shadows. I vaguely recall working in a brokerege firm where an attractive slender mature brunette broker wore a white blouse that showed her areolas through it. These days it seems most women wear padded or molded bra cups and it's rare to even see a pokie. |
The Following 19 Users Say Thank You to George VI For This Useful Post: | ||
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Up to ten year ago bra was considered underwear, not expected to be exposed, with see-through effect (lace, thin tissue etc.). Today women tend to show their bra, therefore bra are made with solid non trasparent tissues. |
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to itit49 For This Useful Post: | ||
#16
|
|||
|
|||
after the nipples...
The see-through topless of the previous post was an exceptional one-only event for the coleagues of my wife. On the other hand they frequently enjoy another (less embarrassing) see-through outfit of my wife.
Let’s go back to the beginning of the story. Shopping afternoon, clothing store, my wife takes a pair of white summer cotton trousers and asks me "Do you like them? ". I am surprised they are of a thin fabric, I guess they are transparent and I am surprised that she has chosen them (she is very modest). I say "try them" assuming she sees that they are transparent and discards them. I was wrong, my wife surprises me again, she comes out of the dressing room wearing the trousers, she has a short t-shirt , her belly is exposed, trousers are transparent, her panties are clearly visible underneath. Her lace panties are see-through, with a little effort you may see the pubic hair below. Last but not least there are two men in the store who are staring at my wife (a boring shopping with their wives became a wonderful voyeur opportunity). I am shocked and my wife keeps on surprising me "they are OK. Do you agree?" I cannot ignore that she is showing her underwear (and partially her pubic hair), "Yeah ... maybe with a longer shirt". We buy the trousers but I am expecting that she will never use them as soon as she realizes that they are transparent. I was wrong, she wears them regularly (often when she goes to the office) with simple solid white panties. In the picture it is my wife with those trousers, you see they are transparent, and you can even see the label of her panties. Her colleagues cannot see her pubic hair but they know exactly which panties she is wearing (model, color, brand etc.) For clarity sake, most of the women under this type of trousers use white thongs, only showing a small triangle above the ass. In my opinion these trousers are more revealing than a miniskirt but sometimes women are difficult to understand. Does your wife/gf wear this type of trousers? In your opinion are they too revealing? |
The Following 21 Users Say Thank You to itit49 For This Useful Post: | ||
#17
|
|||
|
|||
itit49, congratulations on having a wife with a real hot ass, and willing to show it to people. Just my humble opinion - she might just be an innocent wife that has no clue that she is showing more of her body than what is standard for a wife. But I think it very likely that she is VERY aware of what she is flaunting. She managed to get your "approval" for wearing the pants that show her butt and panties off, you busted her "accidentally" showing her tits and nipples to her co-workers and she acted all mortified, and every day she likely thinks about what she can wear to work to get the sexual attention of her male co-workers. Perhaps she just wants to feel pretty and noticed, or perhaps she dreams of getting banged hard over her desk by Tom and Paul without you knowing. Anyway, you asked What do YOU think?
I sort of recall seeing slacks nearly this see-through at work, but not quite. Usually there are at least some pockets in the back. Mostly it's the younger single girls that wear something a tad too revealing to my office, but what parent hasn't told their daughter, "you're dressed like a sl*t." What intrigues me more are the wives that wear something just a little more revealing than the norm. I've seen women wear white skirts that reveal their white panties underneath. My favorite was on an attractive blonde MILF because they were real tight IN FRONT, and as she walked toward me down the hall, I could see most of the front of her panties. I especially liked the way that her panty waistband dipped down just slightly in the front. There is a women where I work that might be about sixty, not really attractive but not unattractive, who quite often wears casual clothes that are just a little bit tight or see-through. Nothing scandelous, just tops that clearly show off her bra through it, white denim slacks that show off the outline of her panties, shirts that are a little tight over her tits, tops that scoop down too much when she leans over. No one outfit is very bad, it's the quantity of outfits that are tight or show flesh. |
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to George VI For This Useful Post: | ||
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
My point is that it is difficult to define what is "showing more of her body than what is standard for a wife". In Western Europe women, wives and not, are used to wear both miniskirts and see-through outfits like the pants of my wife. In my opinion both miniskirts and see-through outfits are revealing, the strange thing is that my wife has a lot of problems in wearing a short skirt (only a few times and with maximum care when moving or sitting) but she has no problems with see-through pants at the office, in real life, with friends. Last but not least I cannot exclude that "she dreams of getting banged hard over her desk by Tom and Paul" but it seems that she tries to tease them with see-through more than with a mini-skirt. For the record sometimes I dream to bang a few of my female co-workers but it is only a dream. I assume that anybody has this type of dreams. |
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to itit49 For This Useful Post: | ||
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Yes, we repressed uptight Americans are too obsessed with nudity and too easily shocked. My personal experience is that I have and still on occasion do see women at work with skirts halfway up their thighs, if that's what's considered a miniskirt these days (In MY day, in the 70s, skirts barely covered a girl's crotch!). But I've never seen see-through pants like those in the picture before, so they would draw my attention much more than a short skirt. A short skirt shows off a woman's legs, but the see through slacks leave little to the imagination as to what she would look like in just her panties alone. Maybe other women in your wife's office wear see-through pants, but if not I have to think that your wife just hasn't looked backward in the mirror, or seen the pic you posted to know what she's showing her co-workers. Maybe she knows exactly what she's doing. So I still feel that a woman with her fine ass wearing those slacks to work is certainly going to increase the sexual attention she gets, even if it's just in Tom's and Paul's eyeballs and filthy minds. But it sure won't decrease the odds of them acting on their urges. Some men like me who have been around know that just because a woman wears something striking doesn't mean she wants sex, but I can't rule out the possibility that other men, such as Tom and Paul, might see a woman showing off her nipples and panties, and at least consider the possibility that she is, to use a corny phrase from 70s porn, a "hot to trot wife!"
|
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to George VI For This Useful Post: | ||
Free Videos - Updated Twice Daily
|
|
|