Our forum has over 12 million
photos, videos and .ZIP files.
uploaded by our members!
|
#111
|
||||
|
||||
In the '70's I worked in a camera shop.
When customers told us their film contained shots that were interesting, personal, private, nude, glamour etc. we would pop it in the processing envelope and give the customer their claim tag. Once out of the shop we would put it in another envelope and order 2 sets of prints instead of one. Then when our envelope came back we would take one set and put it in the original envelope and add our set to our collection. We had well over 500 pics. One day though we got two envelopes mixed up and a customer came back and complained that the glamour pics in his envelope weren't the nude shots of his wife that he had taken!!!! The person who had got the nude shots of his wife never returned to complain. We got a description of his wife and asked him to come back in a couple of days. We gave him '"our" copies of the prints and a free film to compensate for the loss of the negatives. You can only wonder what the customer who got the wrong nudes thought!! |
The Following 22 Users Say Thank You to Counting Pixels For This Useful Post: | ||
#112
|
||||
|
||||
Following on from the story above.
We advertised in several newspapers and mags. that we could offer Discrete processing for Private films. Although we only advertised for a month we got around one film a week for well over a year. They varied from tame glamour to artistic nude to full blown porn. Some customers requested we posted the prints so that they would arrive on a Thursday and some asked us to write on the envelope front Locomotive 7023 photographs or print a return address of South Coast Birdwatchers Assoc. I often wondered if any actually got returned to the Birdwatchers Assoc. and what their secretary, or whoever, would think. 3-4 times per year we would get a roll of film from F.R. Txxxxx (The last name is irrelevant). When processed it contained 3 topless shots of 12 different women. A frontal and a side view from the waist up and a close up of the boobs. All 12 were taken in different homes - obviously the home of the lady photographed. The women were between 25 and 45 yrs. old. After 6 or 7 of these rolls over 18 months. one of our guys was visiting the adjoining town so he went to the address of F.R. Txxxxx, just to have a look, and found it was a Catholic church. So the F.R. obviously stood for Father!!! I wanted to ask him what his technique was to get the ladies to strip. |
The Following 19 Users Say Thank You to Counting Pixels For This Useful Post: | ||
#113
|
||||
|
||||
Happened to us too
Counting,
Something similar happened to us years ago. I posted it some time ago, but I'll add a few details. Shortly after we got married, and before she happily posed for others, we were sending our color film to be processed at a local drug store. They in turn sent the film out to be processed, not an in-store processor. At first there would be only 1 or 2 titty or sheer nightie shots on a regular "family" roll. We never got any negative feedback from the store so we slowly got braver, adding a few more naked shots, but still no full frontal, showing the whole thing shots. I finally convinced my wife to go all the way. We shot a whole roll of 36 exposures of her completely naked, most showing her pubic hair, a few only her breasts and a couple showing her spread open. All clearly showed her face. When I went to pick up the developed photos, I had my negatives but someone else's photos. They were of a number of local landmarks and a few of people I didn't know. That meant someone had my photos and their correct negatives. I went back in and explained the situation and returned the other person's prints. They apologized and said they would send the film out to be reprinted. They said no one else had come in having the wrong prints. (I wonder why?) I filled out the envelope and where it asked for the number of prints per negative I put 1. When I received the photos, I went to the car and opened the envelope to see if I had the right ones this time.There was 3 prints of a few, 2 prints of a few more and of the ones that were really full frontal, only 1 print. I looked down and noticed that the one I had put in the quantity, someone had marked it out and put a 4. I can only assume that when I left after ordering the second set, the young man behind the counter looked at the negatives and decided to order a few prints for himself. So there was someone with all of my original prints and at least 3 additional sets from the second order. From that point on, we sent our nudity photos out to a processor advertizing special adult processing. I found it exciting knowing that someone in our small city had several photos of my young wife totally naked. I wondered if they ever saw her out on the street, or better yet knew her. She never was approached about them. |
The Following 20 Users Say Thank You to hoosierdaddy4 For This Useful Post: | ||
#114
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
. |
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to stevezr1 For This Useful Post: | ||
#115
|
||||
|
||||
my current Mrs has posed for pictures(polaroid) in the 70's & 80's. As of yet, we haven't seen a pic of Brenda but we live in hope
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to geordiekev For This Useful Post: | ||
#116
|
|||
|
|||
1978
We had a brief experience with film cameras. The quality was far superior to polaroid.
I think I sent them mail order to a place in Wisconsin that was advertised in a photography magazine. All went well until one batch was returned with a warning. The open beaver shots, apparently were a no no. Kinda blew my story with the wife that all the work was done with machines with no human interaction I found the whole process tittilating Here's one that was naturally anonymous |
The Following 38 Users Say Thank You to malaprop For This Useful Post: | ||
0nj, acecal, arnoldziffel, BaconBot, BadPhotog, Beelzebozo, breastexp101, Bushwhacker716, Candi Delight, Couple6872, crazyhorse91, cufan86, dandd, DRDavenport, echoes46, erctrl, filbert1953, franzz2, greendoor, Jess561, maymedson11, mrhenderson, nectcouple, oldbuckeye, Omega88, palladin, rak1918, ray123456, robotmartin, rpsaturnal, scott794, Showoffmywife, stiv837, suture, testme97, Tifosi, tylergal, whatnow3 |
#117
|
|||
|
|||
In the late 70's and 80's I used Spectra Photo, I believe in Syracuse. Never had any problems with what I sent, and the quality was excellent. They stressed the fact that no extra copies were made of any prints.
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to likemslick For This Useful Post: | ||
Free Videos - Updated Twice Daily
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|