Photos of Naked Charity Calendars

[osreb]

more rowers----sorry if repost

[dmwatcher]

So I hope I'm not out of line for asking this here, and I definitely apologize in advance if I am, but do you guys ever wonder about the shoots where the girls still wear underwear but the guys are totally nude? I get that guys don't have any "boobs" to cover, but still, doesn't that seem a little unfair?

I mean, not only do the guys have their butts totally out and naked, but all they've got is their hands to cover their penises. Which, I get is enough, but still, let's even say it's based on the fact that each gender can use 1 hand to cover their intimate parts. It seems like most boobs are easier to cover with 1 arm/hand than a penis and balls with 1 hand. Not to mention, female boobs are one of the most exposed "private" areas of the human body, whereas dicks are one of the least shown parts of the human body -of either gender-, if not -the- least shown part.

Thought of another way, guys seem much more exposed then the girls that are effectively wearing a bikini bottom, so no different from the beach, and have their hands to cover their boobs. Meanwhile, their asses and vaginas are completely covered, whereas again, the guys are completely naked except for a well-placed hand that could very easily slip and expose them to their classmates.

I get that guys are generally much more comfortable getting nude in front of the opposite gender, but still, I feel like if I was one of these guys I'd feel like I was kind of getting shafted.

Am I way off-base? How does everyone else feel about this? Are the girls getting the better deal in this scenario?

[Lotfw]

Half naked / all naked / all good

Originally Posted by dmwatcher

So I hope I'm not out of line for asking this here, and I definitely apologize in advance if I am, but do you guys ever wonder about the shoots where the girls still wear underwear but the guys are totally nude? I get that guys don't have any "boobs" to cover, but still, doesn't that seem a little unfair?

I mean, not only do the guys have their butts totally out and naked, but all they've got is their hands to cover their penises. Which, I get is enough, but still, let's even say it's based on the fact that each gender can use 1 hand to cover their intimate parts. It seems like most boobs are easier to cover with 1 arm/hand than a penis and balls with 1 hand. Not to mention, female boobs are one of the most exposed "private" areas of the human body, whereas dicks are one of the least shown parts of the human body -of either gender-, if not -the- least shown part.

Thought of another way, guys seem much more exposed then the girls that are effectively wearing a bikini bottom, so no different from the beach, and have their hands to cover their boobs. Meanwhile, their asses and vaginas are completely covered, whereas again, the guys are completely naked except for a well-placed hand that could very easily slip and expose them to their classmates.

I get that guys are generally much more comfortable getting nude in front of the opposite gender, but still, I feel like if I was one of these guys I'd feel like I was kind of getting shafted.

Am I way off-base? How does everyone else feel about this? Are the girls getting the better deal in this scenario?

[grandeweasel]

Originally Posted by dmwatcher

So I hope I'm not out of line for asking this here, and I definitely apologize in advance if I am, but do you guys ever wonder about the shoots where the girls still wear underwear but the guys are totally nude? I get that guys don't have any "boobs" to cover, but still, doesn't that seem a little unfair?

I mean, not only do the guys have their butts totally out and naked, but all they've got is their hands to cover their penises. Which, I get is enough, but still, let's even say it's based on the fact that each gender can use 1 hand to cover their intimate parts. It seems like most boobs are easier to cover with 1 arm/hand than a penis and balls with 1 hand. Not to mention, female boobs are one of the most exposed "private" areas of the human body, whereas dicks are one of the least shown parts of the human body -of either gender-, if not -the- least shown part.

Thought of another way, guys seem much more exposed then the girls that are effectively wearing a bikini bottom, so no different from the beach, and have their hands to cover their boobs. Meanwhile, their asses and vaginas are completely covered, whereas again, the guys are completely naked except for a well-placed hand that could very easily slip and expose them to their classmates.

I get that guys are generally much more comfortable getting nude in front of the opposite gender, but still, I feel like if I was one of these guys I'd feel like I was kind of getting shafted.

Am I way off-base? How does everyone else feel about this? Are the girls getting the better deal in this scenario?

It's a charity calendar shoot. The models are probably making these decisions by themselves.

[retrac55]

Originally Posted by osreb

more rowers----sorry if repost

lol osreb.. sorry if repost? isn't everything you do a repost? most of these particular pictures were posted only about 10 posts earlier (post 3213) on this same page. if you had scrolled down just a little, you would have seen them. posting something that is on the same page seems very redundant to me.

[ECUpirate]

Originally Posted by retrac55

lol osreb.. sorry if repost? isn't everything you do a repost? most of these particular pictures were posted only about 10 posts earlier (post 3213) on this same page. if you had scrolled down just a little, you would have seen them. posting something that is on the same page seems very redundant to me.

Thanks, retrac55! My first thought when I saw that was, "Well, those are words I never thought I'd see from osreb; he should put them in his signature."

Those pics will soon reappear on the E I E I O thread as "Boating babes; Wet Wednesdays; "Group nudity"; "From the rear"; and if he thinks one girl looks slightly older than the others, as "Mother - Daughter maybe?"

I don't want to sound harsh. New members are constantly coming on board, and they may not have seen the pictures before, so osreb is keeping the pics re-circulating. I admit I miss the context of a photo sometimes, and he often reposts from his own posts just a few pages earlier, but hey, the man wants his million thanks.

[jim914109]

Originally Posted by retrac55

lol osreb.. sorry if repost? isn't everything you do a repost? most of these particular pictures were posted only about 10 posts earlier (post 3213) on this same page. if you had scrolled down just a little, you would have seen them. posting something that is on the same page seems very redundant to me.

Originally Posted by ECUpirate

Thanks, retrac55! My first thought when I saw that was, "Well, those are words I never thought I'd see from osreb; he should put them in his signature."

Those pics will soon reappear on the E I E I O thread as "Boating babes; Wet Wednesdays; "Group nudity"; "From the rear"; and if he thinks one girl looks slightly older than the others, as "Mother - Daughter maybe?"

I don't want to sound harsh. New members are constantly coming on board, and they may not have seen the pictures before, so osreb is keeping the pics re-circulating. I admit I miss the context of a photo sometimes, and he often reposts from his own posts just a few pages earlier, but hey, the man wants his million thanks.

Yes, very glad someone finally said it - thanks to you both. One more thought - it's irritating no end to dig a gem out of somewhere, post it here on OCC to get 20 thanks, then have osreb repost it within a day and get 100...

[Pedro the Fisherman]

Yep, been there, done that....just have to let it wash over you!

[jc666]

Originally Posted by jim914109

it's irritating no end to dig a gem out of somewhere, post it here on OCC to get 20 thanks, then have osreb repost it within a day and get 100...

Agree.

[BareAll]

just on cg