Quote:
Originally Posted by lonmol
Yes and no. It may seem strange, but a naked woman retains a certain amount of dignity. There's very little dignity in underwear. Underwear also gives you a bit of insight into a woman's personality. It's a very personal thing. Women can spend hours choosing their underwear. The style, color, and even the fabric can tell you a lot about her. In my opinion, when it comes to embarrassment, EUF is better than ENF.
|
Agree 100% And I've read about actresses who have no problem doing nude scenes but find underwear scenes totally uncomfortable. It's a completely socially constructed arousal trigger, but a trigger that is fundamentally different than pure nudity. I find the latter can be very artistic and beautiful in a non-sexual way, but a woman winding up unwelcomingly in her underwear really triggers a very base arousal in me. I know we've touched on this before, but a lot of probably stems from earlier cultures mores where underwear was really meant to be intimate and never seen outside of the bedroom or locker room. In movies between the 50s and early 90s, a woman getting stripped to her bra and panties or even bra and slip was meant to be a big deal, especially if she was left embarrassed, humiliated, or vulnerable from it. A woman can wear with confidence a skimpy two-piece bikini and I can appreciate her feminine assets, but if she's stripped out of a conservative blouse and skirt and left trembling in a full-cup bra with huge straps and a white open-bottomed girdle, then OMG!