Our forum has over 9 million
photos, videos and .ZIP files
uploaded by our members!

Black Friday Sale - Lifetime membership for $99.95 (Save $50 !!!)
This deal ends at Midnight (EST) on Black Friday

Go Back   One Click Chicks Forum > General Discussion > Site Feedback & Support
Login
or
Register

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #21  
Old 11-19-2011, 07:19 PM
Fango's Avatar
Fango Fango is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 21,195
Thanks: 32,538
Thanked 116,277 Times in 15,200 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sirseph View Post
Okay, I've been wondering about something for a while, and this seems like the place to ask:

I've posted images and screencaps from my work in the past, and the mods have been nice enough to allow them. However I've only ever posted in my own threads, and then only in the ENF and Sexy Videos sections.

I do other work, and have at times wanted to contribute to some of the other threads with on-topic images. I've been hesitant because I haven't been sure if my work would be considered "pro" because I make money at it, and do my editing in PS.

It gets even more confusing when I see things like a thread that was called "underwear ads" which contained catalog and magazine ads shot by pros and showing professional models, which was posted in the "Sexy Amateurs" section of all places???

I'd love to contribute to threads like "Caged Women," "Collar and Lead," "See through or sheer clothing," and others, but as I have great fondness for OCC (Dear lords, I've been here for seven years! LOL!) I've followed the "when in doubt" rule mentioned above.

I'd like to think that pretty much everything I post is my own original work, and so cannot cause any copyright issues, would make the difference, but before I contribute to other people's threads I'd like to ask.

LOL! I do kind of feel like I'm damned if I do and damned if I don't, since if my work is considered "pro" then I can't contribute, but if it's not then I guess I'm not very good...

Seph
In general, if they're original pics that you've taken, they're fine.

The "underwear ads" thread is a nebulous one, to be sure, but since all of the models are unknown and they're not pay site or adult magazine pics, we allow it.

Fango
__________________



WOW!!! OVER 60,000 people have further contributed to this girl's embarrassment!

If you liked this post, please take a moment to click the Thanks button.
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Fango For This Useful Post:
  #22  
Old 11-19-2011, 08:33 PM
sirseph's Avatar
sirseph sirseph is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,236
Thanks: 344
Thanked 20,654 Times in 1,869 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fango View Post
In general, if they're original pics that you've taken, they're fine.

The "underwear ads" thread is a nebulous one, to be sure, but since all of the models are unknown and they're not pay site or adult magazine pics, we allow it.

Fango
Thanks for the clarity Fango! I guess I can add a few images over the weekend. LOL!
__________________

http://www.dfpproductions.com
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DFP_Productions


The web's ONLY company releasing new ENF content every week!

Now also producing consensual, erotic bondage videos as well!

Please include a statement that it's offered for free with any story suggestions!
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to sirseph For This Useful Post:
  #23  
Old 04-10-2012, 02:20 AM
TJ McDon TJ McDon is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 12
Thanks: 3
Thanked 39 Times in 9 Posts
Default

Ouch.
This is going to be a problem for me, as I'm an amateur photographer, but I use a lot of high level equipment, light boxes, remote flashes, high level cameras, and I also post process my images afterwards (only levels adjustment, contrast, etc, I don't actually "improve" the person). So if I try posting any of my own stuff it will be rejected?

Though I'm unlikely to have a problem with posting my pics, as I don't so far take pictures of this nature.

Last edited by TJ McDon; 04-10-2012 at 02:31 AM.
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to TJ McDon For This Useful Post:
  #24  
Old 04-10-2012, 02:22 AM
Fango's Avatar
Fango Fango is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 21,195
Thanks: 32,538
Thanked 116,277 Times in 15,200 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TJ McDon View Post
So if I try posting any of my own stuff it will be rejected?
No. If you make clear in your post that what you're posting is your original material, it won't be removed.

Fango
__________________



WOW!!! OVER 60,000 people have further contributed to this girl's embarrassment!

If you liked this post, please take a moment to click the Thanks button.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Fango For This Useful Post:
  #25  
Old 04-10-2012, 02:33 AM
TJ McDon TJ McDon is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 12
Thanks: 3
Thanked 39 Times in 9 Posts
Default

Sorry. My mistake. I started typing at the bottom of the FIRST page in this thread, thinking I was at the end of the thread, but hadn't yet read the rest of them. I found the rest when my computer glitched, and my message disappeared. I only found it had posted my message half written, when I found and read the rest of the posts on this thread, and got the clarification from that. I would definitely post a story to go with any pictures I put up, so it wouldn't be an issue.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to TJ McDon For This Useful Post:
  #26  
Old 05-13-2012, 08:24 PM
alphaboo alphaboo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 653
Thanks: 80
Thanked 5,535 Times in 344 Posts
Default Film Production Graduate

I am not boasting but as part of my studies for my film production degree I had to study photography. This encompassed lighting, lens, film stocks, posed photos, studio photos, action photos.

It seems that since I have training if I had photos that I could post here(I don't because if I'm near a naked woman my hands are not on a camera)it might be considered too professional to post.

I mean even a good non professional posed photo tends not to belong in ENF, because it is hard to fake embrassesment- although dfp productions actresses do a very good job of mock embrassesment, but even photos that people get by luck or by having a willing partner, again DFP had a truly great find in the woman in the video in which she ends up naked on her balcony and has to sneak around to her front door naked as well as the video in which she is getting ready for a date and sneezes her towel off(I apologize to her for forgetting her name). She faked embarassment perfectly, can take a crappy photo or a near perfect photo.

I cringe when someone posts a photo of a naked woman when the sun is behind her and doesn't compensate for the back lighting so you can't see her, instead she ends up a shiloutte.

Is the difference the fact I know to over expose the photo so you can see the woman's body?

Or people who use the flash at the wrong time. Digital photograph is at the point where all you have to do is turn on the camera and 99 times out of 100 you will get a good photo.

However does understanding composition, even when catching a non posed photo or being able to take a good action photo like a woman flashing at night disqualifies you? Does knowing how to take that last 1 out of 100 photo and have it come out good disqualify you.

I see some crappy photos that with a mild adjustment would be great. Other photos that have the camera on autofocus so the potted plant is in focus and not the girl. Photos that are too low res but that might be a problem with the upload, the info might still be in the original file.

My point is it seems like some people have criteria that would keep an advanced amature's photos off the board.

How about just adding one thing to post.

Found photo.

or personal photo

Just someway that allows all members regardless of ability to post any photos they have been lucky enough to take themselves.

Or do we need a new forum

Personal amatuer photos

or

Posed amature photos.

I respect the moderators to do whats best. However I am pointing the quality of the photos and photographer vary widely. Are photos that are very low res deleted? Then why should a high quality photo of some guy's girlfriends skinny dipping or dancing topless at a party be deleted?


PS to Susan Susan

I started before there was digital photography and photoshop and other computer programs. I started before the 286 computers. So one does not need to do any altering of a photo to have it be magazine quality. prior to 1990 if you didn't get it on the film it wasn't there. professionals still use 4x4 cameras. Except for some cropping and some minor things like burning in what you shot was what ended up in the magazine with only the basics changes.

people rely to much on computers today to fix their mistakes or to turn crap into gold.

Why does schnatzl have to be so derogatory. Some schmoe in his garage or some model wannabe. There really is no need to insult other members of the board.
__________________
"Gather ye rosebuds while ye may".

Last edited by alphaboo; 05-13-2012 at 08:35 PM.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to alphaboo For This Useful Post:
  #27  
Old 06-04-2012, 06:12 AM
schnytzal's Avatar
schnytzal schnytzal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: SG
Posts: 48
Thanks: 3,172
Thanked 2,392 Times in 109 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alphaboo View Post
....
Why does schnatzl have to be so derogatory. Some schmoe in his garage or some model wannabe. There really is no need to insult other members of the board.
Assuming you mean schnytzal but not sure at all what you mean by "so derogatory." Please explain.

Incidentally, if you're going to chide people about not needing to insult other members, it might be more effective if restrain whatever urge prompts you to call 'em "some schmoe in his garage" or "model wannabe."
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to schnytzal For This Useful Post:
  #28  
Old 06-04-2012, 11:09 PM
eviltwin eviltwin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 296
Thanks: 1,646
Thanked 1,398 Times in 190 Posts
Default

schnytzal, he wasn't calling you that, he was referring to what you had said earlier:

Quote:
Originally Posted by schnytzal View Post
Any photos that were produced for a paysite, OR any photos that "look professional," no matter if some schmoe shot them in his garage and no money changed hands, should not be posted here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by schnytzal View Post
I'd bet the bulk of the professional-looking photos in the thread were shot professionally or semi-professionally but were either vanity projects or intended as model portfolio pics for model wannabes (some I'm certain are the latter).
(my bolds)
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to eviltwin For This Useful Post:
  #29  
Old 07-13-2012, 02:45 PM
alphaboo alphaboo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 653
Thanks: 80
Thanked 5,535 Times in 344 Posts
Default proffesional photo dilema

I had a photo removed as a pro pic. I think it was two girls on a porch. One was completely dressed one completely naked. Although it was a high quality photo I felt it was not pro. The element of staging may indicate a level of professionalism but the composition doesn't.

The girls should have been standing closer to the steps showing more of the path leading to the house making a better composition with the square shape pf the porch. Instead the girls are in between the stairs and the actual porch. However what made me really think it was not pro was the fact the girl's faces are in shadow. A pro would have used bounce cards or a diffuse flash, or an umbrella to place more light on their faces to keep them from being in shadow.

If this is from a pay sight there is no watermark, and if it is from a series, unless I have seen other items in the series all I can know is that it was a one off of some people on vacation and not pro. Maybe the naked girl just got back from the lake and maybe someone got lucky with the camera or is a natural talent. I mean most people have rented a seculded cabin and gone skinny dipping, just in the pre digital age there were very few photos.

So I see many reasons why this is not a pro photo and why others see reasons why it is pro.

In the beginning it was east NO WATERMARKED MATERIAL. Nut no pro pics is very hard because defining what is a pro pic will be very hard. Is there a list of rules yet? However even if there are rules they are almost impossible to work in every instance.

Hence no pro pictures become a dilema.
__________________
"Gather ye rosebuds while ye may".
The Following User Says Thank You to alphaboo For This Useful Post:
  #30  
Old 07-13-2012, 02:54 PM
alphaboo alphaboo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 653
Thanks: 80
Thanked 5,535 Times in 344 Posts
Default to eviltwin

Thanks for understanding the point I was making. In cyberland it's rare when someone comes to your defense so thanks for pulling those quotes and pinpointing what I meant.

To Mr S. I am sorry that your user name was too hard for me to spell correctly. Again sorry.

And Again thanks to Eviltwin
__________________
"Gather ye rosebuds while ye may".
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to alphaboo For This Useful Post:
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Free Videos - Updated Twice Daily
my fantasy1

1m:00s
1,290 Views

01-21-2005
yng German8

4m:42s
916 Views

02-03-2015
ohfuck

1m:27s
1,359 Views

05-14-2016
Wet T Shirt Contest 2

1m:51s
611 Views

03-22-2011
southernbell1 bate ns no sound

11m:57s
452 Views

04-15-2010

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Top referring websites:
The Porn Dude
Epic Webcam Chat


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Black Friday Only - Lifetime membership for $99.95 (Save $50 !!!)