London Zoo Streak For Tigers

[Terrymc77]

More pictures please.

[vittorioarts]

Originally Posted by simonlintworm

managed to find some more pics! Would especially like to see more of the last lady!

super naked woman

[89xMan]

Originally Posted by charly07

Enjoy ist new

god, i love gurlz with tattoos.

[karaban]

Originally Posted by 27cows

Looks like a fun event. Would have certainly gone along and grabbed a few shots myself if I'd known it was happening. But this was one that went under the radar. Looks like it wasn't just me, judging by the various regular WNBR snappers who also missed it.

Did truly nobody notice my post the other day? The event is happening again this year, and you can apply to run or be a spectator online. Running is no barrier to taking footage - indeed, it's encouraged - as user daveduchovny proved last year.

[karaban]

Originally Posted by 27cows

Yep, missed this post I think the controlled nature will put off many seasoned snappers. WNBR rides take place in public and you know where you stand. Having to apply to cover event - that will put most people off, including me. Also, not snapping on public land will deter photographers. The organisers can make up their own rules on a whim.

I didn't go last year, but that's certainly the opposite of what most people said. The organisers - were very up front in explaining that people would be photographed, that the event would be publicised, and so on. I think everyone who went was fully aware of the situation. By contrast, WNBRs have shifting rules that change all the time (don't agree with your part in bold), and there's frequently huge friction between riders and photogs. Haven't heard of any of that from Tiger Streak. Actually, the rules are very sensible - photogs are behind a barrier, so they can't get into too much personal space, runners must be naked but can wear a mask if they don't want to be identified. WNBR would be a lot easier with that clarity.

Would also guess that they won't change the rules this year either - they need the publicity after all, they're hardly going to hold it behind closed doors.

[daveduchovny]

I would love to do this again but you have to pledge to raise £150 and I annoyed enough people begging for sponsorship last year. Might say it's worth paying it yourself (as well as the entrance fee) for the experience but I'm having to tighten my belt this year.

Having said that if 15 OCC users pledged £10 each sponsorship I'd happily go get you some more runners-eye pictures, I'll have more of a strategy this time round, not to mention a spare battery...

I can give some tips to anyone else running too... run backwards so you get more than just butts! Don't be shy, everyone knows they are fair game to be photographed. Ask, and sometimes girls will pose for a better shot than if you just shoot them sneakily (they will sometimes even drop their modesty covers!).

[flanker7]

Originally Posted by daveduchovny

I would love to do this again but you have to pledge to raise £150 and I annoyed enough people begging for sponsorship last year. Might say it's worth paying it yourself (as well as the entrance fee) for the experience but I'm having to tighten my belt this year.

Having said that if 15 OCC users pledged £10 each sponsorship I'd happily go get you some more runners-eye pictures, I'll have more of a strategy this time round, not to mention a spare battery...

I can give some tips to anyone else running too... run backwards so you get more than just butts! Don't be shy, everyone knows they are fair game to be photographed. Ask, and sometimes girls will pose for a better shot than if you just shoot them sneakily (they will sometimes even drop their modesty covers!).

Good plan. I would suggest anyone interested in contributing should PM daveduchovny.

[flashingfemales]

Originally Posted by karaban

I didn't go last year, but that's certainly the opposite of what most people said. The organisers - were very up front in explaining that people would be photographed, that the event would be publicised, and so on. I think everyone who went was fully aware of the situation. By contrast, WNBRs have shifting rules that change all the time (don't agree with your part in bold), and there's frequently huge friction between riders and photogs. Haven't heard of any of that from Tiger Streak. Actually, the rules are very sensible - photogs are behind a barrier, so they can't get into too much personal space, runners must be naked but can wear a mask if they don't want to be identified. WNBR would be a lot easier with that clarity.

Would also guess that they won't change the rules this year either - they need the publicity after all, they're hardly going to hold it behind closed doors.

I agree, even Fremont Solstice has figured this out and they're having record numbers of riders now a days. Just make it VERY CLEAR people will be photographed and draw a line and make it clear that participators are on one side while the photographers are on the other. And there's no "but WNBR is a free ride while you have to pay for the Tiger Streak" because Fremont is a free ride as well.

Make people FULLY AWARE of the situation and you'll be surprised how many people show up, especially if it's for a good cause.

[hfaukncg]

Another set of photos from last year:
hXXps://onedrive.live.com/?cid=460e11460b90cdd8&id=460E11460B90CDD8%21612&au thkey=!AKr6jWHgi2XNBO4

[flanker7]

Originally Posted by hfaukncg

Another set of photos from last year:
hXXps://onedrive.live.com/?cid=460e11460b90cdd8&id=460E11460B90CDD8%21612&au thkey=!AKr6jWHgi2XNBO4

You will want to delete the space in the link, otherwise you will get a message saying the album doesn't exist.