Quote:
Originally Posted by 24r135
I have (seen) a higher resolution version of this one, I'll maybe look it up later. She is Definitely pantyless, I assure you. edit: Atleast, I remember it as such, again, I'll look it up later.
|
Ok, the version I had was the same resolution. Funny how memory works. I do see how one could think it is a fake, but in this case I tend to give it the benefit of the doubt. I've seen a few fakes where there was obviously no effort put in, resulting in a similarly blurry upper pussy area. However, in all cases that I remember a lot of other things would also make no sense: everything would be centered or wrong in terms of aspect ratio, like forcing a certain shape into the space you have available. Looking like someone didn't know how that looks in real life. There would be harsh and straight cutoff lines, and the amount of blur and other artifacts would be noticeably different. But in this case, the brightness of her mound is common when there's a light source from the front, amount of blur matches, no straight cut-lines. And based on my flaky memory I think this picture is already quite old. And it's not that uncommon for women to be pantyless when partying, some might even ask what the big deal is.
It's the perfect picture to fake if you can match the quality of your insert, or perhaps the final was deliberately reduced in quality to hide any traces.
But I'd say this isn't a fake.