View Single Post
  #6  
Old 07-05-2017, 10:10 PM
nosti8 nosti8 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 419
Thanks: 262
Thanked 15,885 Times in 436 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carsondcarson View Post
Which makes me think, In Firefox, you can select almost anything that looks like a Url (it would seem HTTP:// or even WWW. are not required) does this also trigger a referral from the origination page / Domain? Anyone know? if it does then even auto removing the http and www is a moot point.
I'm curious about this, too. Also, in Chrome, when you highlight a URL and right click to copy, it gives you an option to go to that Web site. If I click that, does that count as a referral? I wouldn't think so, but I'd still like to know for sure.

As far as the suggestion itself, a couple things:

First, do we know if this would even work? Does blocking a term include blocking it when it's part of a string of characters? Well, let's test it: wh*r*://www.sl*t.b*tch.com

OK, works if I type it in. Now what if I add a link?

And therein lies the problem. Even when I create a link using a rule-compliant piece of text, it still censors it. This idea would effectively prevent any active links whatsoever on the forum. I use internal links too often to be OK with that.

Good suggestion, but I have to vote no on this.

Last edited by nosti8; 07-05-2017 at 10:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to nosti8 For This Useful Post: