View Single Post
  #5  
Old 10-29-2018, 04:03 PM
bfly bfly is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 64
Thanks: 95
Thanked 1,987 Times in 64 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fixit View Post
If i may offer a different viewpoint, your post appears to be centered around the "gross" factor of showing sperm after ejaculation. Back in the day, porn was new and men were inexperienced in front of a camera. Production costs were by the hour, so the longer the guy took, the more it cost. To hasten production and reduce costs, male orgasms were often faked if the man couldn't perform within a certain time schedule. I'm sure you have seen old porn where the gal has been sucking for 10 minutes and the guy comes in her mouth, no sperm visible, with a flaccid penis. This degraded the quality of the shoot, and people complained about the not quite XXX factor. More like soft porn on steroids. Visible sperm meant the money shot. End of shoot.
Yep, that seems logical. As I said, this is the way the traditional (that is, professional porn, who keeps the whole industry going) is made, and amateurs usually follow suit, wishing that or not. I'm not saying it's wrong, I'm just saying that, as a result all that, the videos I described above are hard to find.

It's just that at some point I found myself bored of typical endings, and wanted to search for something fresh, which eventually resulted in this post

Quote:
Originally Posted by fixit View Post
Do you object to sperm being shot on a stomach, or a facial?
In this thread I do, as it is about swallowing after all. In general no (however facials also seem to me too common).
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to bfly For This Useful Post: